Statutory Instruments 1999 No. 1074 (S. 85)
The Police (Conduct) (Senior Officers) (Scotland) Regulations 1999
- continued

Back to previous page

 

Statements in lieu of oral evidence
     18.  - (1) Subject to the provisions of this regulation, the chairman may, in lieu of oral evidence, admit evidence by way of a written statement but evidence shall not be admissible in pursuance of this regulation if it would not have been admissible had it been given orally.

    (2) If either the independent solicitor or the senior officer (in this regulation referred to as "the parties") proposes in pursuance of this regulation to adduce written evidence at a hearing, he shall-

    (3) The chairman shall admit evidence by way of written statement under paragraph (1) only if-

    (4) Where, notwithstanding that a written statement has been admitted in evidence without the person who made the statement being called and being available as aforesaid, the chairman is of the opinion that oral evidence should be given, he may request that that person be called as a witness and, in such case, unless that person gives oral evidence, the chairman shall be entitled to disregard the written evidence.

    (5) Nothing in this regulation shall prejudice the admission of written evidence which would be admissible apart from the provisions thereof.

Adjournment of misconduct hearing
    
19.  - (1) The chairman may from time to time adjourn the hearing to a later time or date if it appears to him necessary or expedient to do so for the due hearing of the case.

    (2) Where the chairman adjourns the hearing to a later date he shall forthwith provide the senior officer with a written notice of the time, date and place of the adjourned hearing.

Hearing in absence of the senior officer
    
20.  - (1) If the senior officer does not attend at the misconduct hearing or at any adjournment thereof, the hearing may be proceeded with and concluded in his absence if it appears to the chairman just and proper to do so.

    (2) Notwithstanding the terms of paragraph (1)-

    (3) Subject to paragraph (2), where, owing to the absence of the senior officer, it is not possible to comply with the whole or any part of the procedure described in these Regulations, the case may be proceeded with as if that procedure had been complied with.

Report of the chairman of the misconduct hearing
    
21.  - (1) Except in any case to which paragraph (2) applies, the chairman of the misconduct hearing shall as soon as possible after the conclusion of the hearing submit a report to the police authority setting out-

    (2) In any case in which after the commencement of a misconduct hearing the police authority has directed that the allegation of misconduct shall no longer be heard, the police authority shall notify the chairman of the misconduct hearing in writing as to that direction, and the chairman shall thereafter terminate the proceedings and report to the police authority accordingly.

    (3) The chairman of the misconduct hearing shall send a copy of the report to the senior officer.

Decision of police authority
    
22.  - (1) When the police authority has received the report of the chairman of the misconduct hearing in terms of regulation 21(1), or where it has determined to deal with the case in terms of regulation 13(2), the police authority shall decide either to dismiss the case or-

    (2) As soon as possible after the police authority has reached a decision in accordance with paragraph (1), it shall arrange for-

    (3) Where the misconduct hearing arises out of a complaint made by a member of the public, the police authority shall notify the complainer in writing of the finding made.

Disposal
    
23.  - (1) The disposals which may be recommended by the chairman of the misconduct hearing or made by the police authority shall be one of the following:-

and separate disposals may be made in relation to separate findings of misconduct in relation to each allegation of misconduct specified in the misconduct form.

    (2) Where the police authority has notified the senior officer that it has decided to consider making a disposal, the senior officer, shall within 14 days of the date on which such notification is made, give notice to the police authority whether he wishes to make oral or written representations in relation to the matter of the disposal.

    (3) Where the senior officer gives notice that he wishes to make written representations, he shall submit those representations within 28 days of having received the notification referred to in paragraph (2).

    (4) Where the senior officer gives notice that he wishes to make oral representations to the police authority, the authority shall give reasonable notice of the time, date and the place at which those representations may be made.

    (5) At any hearing referred to in paragraph (4), the senior officer may be represented-

    (6) The senior officer may waive requirements for notice or agree to shorter periods of notice than those specified in paragraphs (2) to (4), and in any such case the senior officer shall give notice to the police authority in writing to that effect.

    (7) The police authority may on the application in writing of the senior officer extend the periods of time appointed under paragraphs (2) and (3) notwithstanding that the time appointed may have expired.

    (8) Before deciding on a disposal the police authority shall have regard to the senior officer's record of police service.

    (9) After the period within which the senior officer may make representations in relation to the disposal has elapsed and after considering any representations which are being made by or on behalf of him, the police authority may decide either to make no disposal or to make a disposal as mentioned in paragraph (1).

    (10) As soon as possible after reaching a decision in accordance with paragraph (9), the police authority shall arrange for-

    (11) Where a disposal as mentioned in paragraph (1)(b) has been made and the senior officer has not resigned from the force in accordance with the requirement specified in the decision, then the effect of the decision shall be to dismiss the senior officer from the force either forthwith or on the date specified in the decision.

    (12) If the police authority decides to make a disposal in terms of paragraph (1)(c)-

Expenses
    
24.  - (1) All the expenses of a hearing before the chairman of a misconduct hearing or the police authority under these Regulations, including reasonable expenses incurred by the senior officer in preparation and conduct of the defence, shall be defrayed by the police authority.

    (2) Any expenses payable under paragraph (1) shall be subject to taxation in such manner as the Secretary of State may direct.

    (3) The police authority may reimburse in whole or in part any expenses reasonably incurred by the senior officer in connection with proceedings under these Regulations after the date of service of any investigation form and until either the service of a misconduct form or notification that no proceedings are to be taken.

Suspension - ordinary procedure
    
25.  - (1) Where it appears to the police authority, on receiving a report, allegation or complaint from which it appears that any act or omission, or an alleged act or omission, of a senior officer may amount to misconduct or a criminal offence and that the senior officer ought to be suspended from duty and from his office as a constable of a police force, the police authority may, subject to the following provisions of this regulation, so suspend him.

    (2) The police authority shall not so suspend a senior officer unless it appears to it that either of the following conditions ("the suspension conditions") is satisfied-

    (3) If the police authority determines that a senior officer ought to be suspended under this regulation, it shall forthwith notify the Secretary of State in writing of its decision and of the relevant reasons.

    (4) If, upon being so notified of the decision of the police authority the Secretary of State is satisfied both as to the suspension condition and reasons, he shall as soon as practicable notify his approval of the suspension of the senior officer to the police authority; and the suspension of the senior officer shall not have effect unless the approval of the Secretary of State is given.

    (5) Where the Secretary of State gives his approval to the suspension of a senior officer his suspension shall take effect from the time he receives notice of the Secretary of State's approval thereof from the police authority, and he shall be suspended until-

    (6) The suspension of a senior officer under this regulation shall cease to have effect at the expiry of 3 months from the date of imposition or reimposition unless the police authority shall before such expiration have-

    (7) Where a suspension is to be reimposed under paragraph (6), the provisions of paragraphs (3) to (5) shall apply to the reimposition.

Suspension - urgent cases
    
26.  - (1) Subject to paragraph (2), in cases of urgency, the like power of suspension as under regulation 25 may be exercised with immediate effect by the police authority.

    (2) Where a senior officer has been suspended under paragraph (1), the police authority shall notify the Secretary of State forthwith and shall specify the reason for suspension under this regulation.

    (3) Without prejudice to regulation 25, the suspension of a senior officer under this regulation shall cease to have effect at the expiry of 72 hours from the imposition thereof unless within that period the Secretary of State has notified the police authority of his approval thereof.

Suspension - termination
    
27.  - (1) This regulation applies in any case in which a senior officer has been suspended from duty and from his office as a constable of a police force in terms of regulation 25 or 26.

    (2) Where the suspension of a senior officer ceases to have effect upon the occurrence of any of the events specified in regulation 25(5) and the suspension has not been reimposed in accordance with regulation 25(6), that officer shall not be liable to be suspended again in respect of the report, allegation or complaint which led to the suspension which has ceased to have effect.

Transcripts
    
28.  - (1) Where the police authority make a disposal specified in either sub-paragraph (a) or (b) of regulation 23(1), the senior officer may, not later than 28 days after the date on which the authority's decision is notified in terms of regulation 22(2), by notice in writing addressed to the authority request the authority to provide him with a transcript of all or a specified part of the audio recording of the proceedings at the misconduct hearing made in accordance with regulation 17(12).

    (2) In giving notice under paragraph (1), the senior officer shall state whether a transcript of all or part of audio recording is requested and, if only part is requested, specify the relevant part.

    (3) If, after considering a notice submitted under paragraph (1), the police authority is of the opinion that the transcript requested is or might be necessary for an appeal in terms of section 30 of the 1967 Act[
5] by the senior officer against the authority's decision under regulation 22, it shall arrange for the transcript to be prepared and for a copy to be sent to the appellant.

Police authority to notify decision to Secretary of State
     29. The police authority shall give notice to the Secretary of State of any decision made under regulation 22 and any disposal made under regulation 23 and, in any case in which it has received the report of the chairman of the misconduct hearing in terms of regulation 21(1), it shall forward a copy of that report to the Secretary of State.

Records
    
30.  - (1) The police authority shall keep-

    (2) The police authority shall retain-

Revocations, savings and transitional provisions
    
31.  - (1) Subject to the following provisions of this regulation, the 1996 Regulations are herby revoked.

    (2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), the 1996 Regulations shall continue to apply (but subject to regulation 31(2) of the 1996 Regulations) to any case where an act or omission was committed or made by a senior officer before 1st May 1999 which amounts or may amount to a disciplinary offence, as defined in regulation 2(1) of the 1996 Regulations, at the time when the act or omission was committed or made, including, without prejudice to that generality, any such case irrespective of whether it is before, on or after that date that-

but for the avoidance of doubt, the 1996 Regulations do not apply to a case where-


Henry B McLeish
Minister of State, The Scottish Office

St Andrew's House, Edinburgh
24th March 1999



SCHEDULE
Regulation 4


CONDUCT CONSTITUTING MISCONDUCT


     1. Conduct likely to bring discredit on the police force or service, including-

     2. Failure to comply, without good and sufficient cause, with a lawful order.

     3. Failure to report any matter which it is the senior officer's duty to report or to account for any act or omission in the ordinary course of duty which he has a duty to account for.

     4. Neglect of duty.

     5. Wilful or careless falsehood.

     6. Malingering.

     7. Being absent from duty, or being late for duty, without leave.

     8. Contravention of regulation 5 of, or Schedule 1 to, the Police (Scotland) Regulations 1976[
6].

     9. Having been found guilty by a criminal court of a criminal offence in any part of the United Kingdom or in any of the Channel Islands or the Isle of Man.



EXPLANATORY NOTE

(This note is not part of the Regulations)


These Regulations replace the Police (Conduct) (Senior Officers) (Scotland) Regulations 1996 ("the 1996 Regulations").

The Regulations make revised provision for the procedures for cases in which a constable of the rank of chief constable or assistant chief constable (a "senior officer") who is the subject of an allegation of misconduct may be dealt with by dismissal, requirement to resign, reduction in rank, reduction in rate of pay, fine, reprimand or caution.

Regulations 1 to 3 make provision with respect to citation, commencement, application and interpretation.

Regulation 4 of, and the Schedule to, the Regulations define what is meant by misconduct on the part of a constable to whom the Regulations apply.

Regulation 5 prescribes the preliminary procedure to be followed where an allegation of complaint of misconduct is made against a senior officer. Except where an allegation or complaint appears to be unfounded or frivolous or, if proven, would only involve a minor or trivial matter, the allegation or complaint will be referred to an investigating officer. The investigating officer is required to prepare and provide to the senior officer who is the subject of the complaint an investigation form containing relevant information.

Regulation 6 makes provision for considering whether there is sufficient evidence following receipt of the report of the investigating officer to justify requiring a misconduct hearing to be held.

Regulation 7 provides for appointment by the police authority of an independent solicitor if they think there is sufficient evidence of misconduct which justify requiring the senior officer to appear before a misconduct hearing. That solicitor must consider this and prepare a misconduct form containing particulars of the alleged misconduct if he thinks there is evidence of misconduct justifying a requirement that the senior officer appear before a misconduct hearing. In terms of regulation 8, the police authority may decide if the senior officer should be so required in which case a copy of the misconduct form must be sent to the senior officer requiring him to attend a hearing.

Regulation 9 enables the police authority to delay investigations where the matter is also the subject of criminal investigations.

Regulation 10 enables misconduct proceedings to be terminated before the conclusion of a misconduct hearing where the police authority consider this is appropriate.

Regulations 11 and 12 specify the documents and other information to be supplied where a misconduct hearing is required. Regulation 13 provides for the procedure where the allegation of misconduct is admitted.

Regulation 14 provides for appointment of a chairman of the misconduct hearing and regulation 15 provides for the arrangement of the hearing. Regulation 16 provides for representation at the hearing.

Regulations 17 to 20 make provision with respect to the holding of and procedure at a misconduct hearing at which evidence may be heard and a full opportunity given to the senior officer to defend the allegations made against him.

In terms of regulation 21 the chairman of the misconduct hearing must report to the police authority his decision and reasons, a copy of which must also be sent to the senior officer.

Regulation 22 provides that the police authority must decide, on the basis of the report by the chairman of the misconduct hearing, whether there was misconduct and, if so, whether to consider making a disposal.

Regulation 23 specifies the disposals which may be recommended by the chairman in disposing of the case if he finds that there has been misconduct and which may be made by the police authority.



Regulation 25 to 27 regulate suspension of a senior officer who is subject to an allegation of misconduct.

Regulations 28 to 30 deal with supplementary matters.

Regulation 31(1) revokes the 1996 Regulations.

By virtue of regulation 31(2), the 1996 Regulations continue to apply where an act or omission of a senior officer which may amount to a disciplinary offence under the 1996 Regulations occurs before the date on which these Regulations come into force.


Notes:

[5] Section 30 was substituted by the Police and Magistrates' Courts Act 1994 (c.29), section 55(1).back

[6] S.I. 1976/1073; relevant amending instruments are S.I. 1985/111, 1990/469, 1993/3081 and 1995/596.back



ISBN 0 11 059037 6


 
Powhillon home |  OPSI home

© Crown copyright 1999
Prepared 12 May 1999