|
Statements in lieu of oral evidence
18.
- (1) Subject to the provisions of this
regulation, the chairman may, in lieu of oral evidence, admit evidence
by way of a written statement but evidence shall not be admissible in
pursuance of this regulation if it would not have been admissible had
it been given orally.
(2) If either the independent solicitor or the
senior officer (in this regulation referred to as "the parties")
proposes in pursuance of this regulation to adduce written evidence at
a hearing, he shall-
(3) The chairman shall admit evidence by way of written statement under paragraph (1) only if-
(4) Where, notwithstanding that a
written statement has been admitted in evidence without the person who
made the statement being called and being available as aforesaid, the
chairman is of the opinion that oral evidence should be given, he may
request that that person be called as a witness and, in such case,
unless that person gives oral evidence, the chairman shall be entitled
to disregard the written evidence.
(5) Nothing in this regulation shall prejudice
the admission of written evidence which would be admissible apart from
the provisions thereof.
Adjournment of misconduct hearing
19.
- (1) The chairman may from time to time
adjourn the hearing to a later time or date if it appears to him
necessary or expedient to do so for the due hearing of the case.
(2) Where the chairman adjourns the hearing to
a later date he shall forthwith provide the senior officer with a
written notice of the time, date and place of the adjourned hearing.
Hearing in absence of the senior officer
20.
- (1) If the senior officer does not attend at
the misconduct hearing or at any adjournment thereof, the hearing may
be proceeded with and concluded in his absence if it appears to the
chairman just and proper to do so.
(2) Notwithstanding the terms of paragraph (1)-
(3) Subject to paragraph (2),
where, owing to the absence of the senior officer, it is not possible
to comply with the whole or any part of the procedure described in
these Regulations, the case may be proceeded with as if that procedure
had been complied with.
Report of the chairman of the misconduct hearing
21.
- (1) Except in any case to which paragraph (2)
applies, the chairman of the misconduct hearing shall as soon as
possible after the conclusion of the hearing submit a report to the
police authority setting out-
(2) In any case in which after the
commencement of a misconduct hearing the police authority has directed
that the allegation of misconduct shall no longer be heard, the police
authority shall notify the chairman of the misconduct hearing in
writing as to that direction, and the chairman shall thereafter
terminate the proceedings and report to the police authority
accordingly.
(3) The chairman of the misconduct hearing shall send a copy of the report to the senior officer.
Decision of police authority
22.
- (1) When the police authority has received
the report of the chairman of the misconduct hearing in terms of
regulation 21(1), or where it has determined to deal with the case in
terms of regulation 13(2), the police authority shall decide either to
dismiss the case or-
(2) As soon as possible after the
police authority has reached a decision in accordance with paragraph
(1), it shall arrange for-
(3) Where the misconduct hearing
arises out of a complaint made by a member of the public, the police
authority shall notify the complainer in writing of the finding made.
Disposal
23.
- (1) The disposals which may be recommended by
the chairman of the misconduct hearing or made by the police authority
shall be one of the following:-
and separate disposals may be made in relation to separate
findings of misconduct in relation to each allegation of misconduct
specified in the misconduct form.
(2) Where the police authority has notified the
senior officer that it has decided to consider making a disposal, the
senior officer, shall within 14 days of the date on which such
notification is made, give notice to the police authority whether he
wishes to make oral or written representations in relation to the
matter of the disposal.
(3) Where the senior officer gives notice that
he wishes to make written representations, he shall submit those
representations within 28 days of having received the notification
referred to in paragraph (2).
(4) Where the senior officer gives notice that
he wishes to make oral representations to the police authority, the
authority shall give reasonable notice of the time, date and the place
at which those representations may be made.
(5) At any hearing referred to in paragraph (4), the senior officer may be represented-
(6) The senior officer may waive
requirements for notice or agree to shorter periods of notice than
those specified in paragraphs (2) to (4), and in any such case the
senior officer shall give notice to the police authority in writing to
that effect.
(7) The police authority may on the application
in writing of the senior officer extend the periods of time appointed
under paragraphs (2) and (3) notwithstanding that the time appointed
may have expired.
(8) Before deciding on a disposal the police
authority shall have regard to the senior officer's record of police
service.
(9) After the period within which the senior
officer may make representations in relation to the disposal has
elapsed and after considering any representations which are being made
by or on behalf of him, the police authority may decide either to make
no disposal or to make a disposal as mentioned in paragraph (1).
(10) As soon as possible after reaching a
decision in accordance with paragraph (9), the police authority shall
arrange for-
(11) Where a disposal as mentioned
in paragraph (1)(b) has been made and the senior officer has not
resigned from the force in accordance with the requirement specified in
the decision, then the effect of the decision shall be to dismiss the
senior officer from the force either forthwith or on the date specified
in the decision.
(12) If the police authority decides to make a disposal in terms of paragraph (1)(c)-
Expenses
24.
- (1) All the expenses of a hearing before the
chairman of a misconduct hearing or the police authority under these
Regulations, including reasonable expenses incurred by the senior
officer in preparation and conduct of the defence, shall be defrayed by
the police authority.
(2) Any expenses payable under paragraph (1)
shall be subject to taxation in such manner as the Secretary of State
may direct.
(3) The police authority may reimburse in whole
or in part any expenses reasonably incurred by the senior officer in
connection with proceedings under these Regulations after the date of
service of any investigation form and until either the service of a
misconduct form or notification that no proceedings are to be taken.
Suspension - ordinary procedure
25.
- (1) Where it appears to the police authority,
on receiving a report, allegation or complaint from which it appears
that any act or omission, or an alleged act or omission, of a senior
officer may amount to misconduct or a criminal offence and that the
senior officer ought to be suspended from duty and from his office as a
constable of a police force, the police authority may, subject to the
following provisions of this regulation, so suspend him.
(2) The police authority shall not so suspend a
senior officer unless it appears to it that either of the following
conditions ("the suspension conditions") is satisfied-
(3) If the police authority
determines that a senior officer ought to be suspended under this
regulation, it shall forthwith notify the Secretary of State in writing
of its decision and of the relevant reasons.
(4) If, upon being so notified of the decision
of the police authority the Secretary of State is satisfied both as to
the suspension condition and reasons, he shall as soon as practicable
notify his approval of the suspension of the senior officer to the
police authority; and the suspension of the senior officer shall not
have effect unless the approval of the Secretary of State is given.
(5) Where the Secretary of State gives his
approval to the suspension of a senior officer his suspension shall
take effect from the time he receives notice of the Secretary of
State's approval thereof from the police authority, and he shall be
suspended until-
(6) The suspension of a senior
officer under this regulation shall cease to have effect at the expiry
of 3 months from the date of imposition or reimposition unless the
police authority shall before such expiration have-
(7) Where a suspension is to be
reimposed under paragraph (6), the provisions of paragraphs (3) to (5)
shall apply to the reimposition.
Suspension - urgent cases
26.
- (1) Subject to paragraph (2), in cases of
urgency, the like power of suspension as under regulation 25 may be
exercised with immediate effect by the police authority.
(2) Where a senior officer has been suspended
under paragraph (1), the police authority shall notify the Secretary of
State forthwith and shall specify the reason for suspension under this
regulation.
(3) Without prejudice to regulation 25, the
suspension of a senior officer under this regulation shall cease to
have effect at the expiry of 72 hours from the imposition thereof
unless within that period the Secretary of State has notified the
police authority of his approval thereof.
Suspension - termination
27.
- (1) This regulation applies in any case in
which a senior officer has been suspended from duty and from his office
as a constable of a police force in terms of regulation 25 or 26.
(2) Where the suspension of a senior officer
ceases to have effect upon the occurrence of any of the events
specified in regulation 25(5) and the suspension has not been reimposed
in accordance with regulation 25(6), that officer shall not be liable
to be suspended again in respect of the report, allegation or complaint
which led to the suspension which has ceased to have effect.
Transcripts
28.
- (1) Where the police authority make a
disposal specified in either sub-paragraph (a) or (b) of regulation
23(1), the senior officer may, not later than 28 days after the date on
which the authority's decision is notified in terms of regulation
22(2), by notice in writing addressed to the authority request the
authority to provide him with a transcript of all or a specified part
of the audio recording of the proceedings at the misconduct hearing
made in accordance with regulation 17(12).
(2) In giving notice under paragraph (1), the
senior officer shall state whether a transcript of all or part of audio
recording is requested and, if only part is requested, specify the
relevant part.
(3) If, after considering a notice submitted
under paragraph (1), the police authority is of the opinion that the
transcript requested is or might be necessary for an appeal in terms of
section 30 of the 1967 Act[5]
by the senior officer against the authority's decision under regulation
22, it shall arrange for the transcript to be prepared and for a copy
to be sent to the appellant.
Police authority to notify decision to Secretary of State
29.
The police authority shall give notice to the Secretary of
State of any decision made under regulation 22 and any disposal made
under regulation 23 and, in any case in which it has received the
report of the chairman of the misconduct hearing in terms of regulation
21(1), it shall forward a copy of that report to the Secretary of State.
Records
30.
- (1) The police authority shall keep-
(2) The police authority shall retain-
Revocations, savings and transitional provisions
31.
- (1) Subject to the following provisions of this regulation, the 1996 Regulations are herby revoked.
(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), the 1996
Regulations shall continue to apply (but subject to regulation 31(2) of
the 1996 Regulations) to any case where an act or omission was
committed or made by a senior officer before 1st May 1999 which amounts
or may amount to a disciplinary offence, as defined in regulation 2(1)
of the 1996 Regulations, at the time when the act or omission was
committed or made, including, without prejudice to that generality, any
such case irrespective of whether it is before, on or after that date
that-
but for the avoidance of doubt, the 1996 Regulations do not apply to a case where-
Henry B McLeish
Minister of State, The Scottish Office
St Andrew's House, Edinburgh
24th March 1999
SCHEDULERegulation 4
CONDUCT CONSTITUTING MISCONDUCT
1.
Conduct likely to bring discredit on the police force or service, including-
2.
Failure to comply, without good and sufficient cause, with a lawful order.
3.
Failure to report any matter which it is the senior officer's duty to
report or to account for any act or omission in the ordinary course of
duty which he has a duty to account for.
4.
Neglect of duty.
5.
Wilful or careless falsehood.
6.
Malingering.
7.
Being absent from duty, or being late for duty, without leave.
8.
Contravention of regulation 5 of, or Schedule 1 to, the Police (Scotland) Regulations 1976[6].
9.
Having been found guilty by a criminal court of a criminal offence in
any part of the United Kingdom or in any of the Channel Islands or the
Isle of Man.
EXPLANATORY NOTE
(This note is not part of the Regulations)
These Regulations replace the Police (Conduct) (Senior Officers) (Scotland) Regulations 1996 ("the 1996 Regulations").
The Regulations make revised provision for the procedures for cases in
which a constable of the rank of chief constable or assistant chief
constable (a "senior officer") who is the subject of an allegation of
misconduct may be dealt with by dismissal, requirement to resign,
reduction in rank, reduction in rate of pay, fine, reprimand or caution.
Regulations 1 to 3 make provision with respect to citation, commencement, application and interpretation.
Regulation 4 of, and the Schedule to, the Regulations define what is
meant by misconduct on the part of a constable to whom the Regulations
apply.
Regulation 5 prescribes the preliminary procedure to be followed where
an allegation of complaint of misconduct is made against a senior
officer. Except where an allegation or complaint appears to be
unfounded or frivolous or, if proven, would only involve a minor or
trivial matter, the allegation or complaint will be referred to an
investigating officer. The investigating officer is required to prepare
and provide to the senior officer who is the subject of the complaint
an investigation form containing relevant information.
Regulation 6 makes provision for considering whether there is
sufficient evidence following receipt of the report of the
investigating officer to justify requiring a misconduct hearing to be
held.
Regulation 7 provides for appointment by the police authority of an
independent solicitor if they think there is sufficient evidence of
misconduct which justify requiring the senior officer to appear before
a misconduct hearing. That solicitor must consider this and prepare a
misconduct form containing particulars of the alleged misconduct if he
thinks there is evidence of misconduct justifying a requirement that
the senior officer appear before a misconduct hearing. In terms of
regulation 8, the police authority may decide if the senior officer
should be so required in which case a copy of the misconduct form must
be sent to the senior officer requiring him to attend a hearing.
Regulation 9 enables the police authority to delay investigations where
the matter is also the subject of criminal investigations.
Regulation 10 enables misconduct proceedings to be terminated before
the conclusion of a misconduct hearing where the police authority
consider this is appropriate.
Regulations 11 and 12 specify the documents and other information to be
supplied where a misconduct hearing is required. Regulation 13 provides
for the procedure where the allegation of misconduct is admitted.
Regulation 14 provides for appointment of a chairman of the misconduct
hearing and regulation 15 provides for the arrangement of the hearing.
Regulation 16 provides for representation at the hearing.
Regulations 17 to 20 make provision with respect to the holding of and
procedure at a misconduct hearing at which evidence may be heard and a
full opportunity given to the senior officer to defend the allegations
made against him.
In terms of regulation 21 the chairman of the misconduct hearing must
report to the police authority his decision and reasons, a copy of
which must also be sent to the senior officer.
Regulation 22 provides that the police authority must decide, on the
basis of the report by the chairman of the misconduct hearing, whether
there was misconduct and, if so, whether to consider making a disposal.
Regulation 23 specifies the disposals which may be recommended by the
chairman in disposing of the case if he finds that there has been
misconduct and which may be made by the police authority.
Regulation 25 to 27 regulate suspension of a senior officer who is subject to an allegation of misconduct.
Regulations 28 to 30 deal with supplementary matters.
Regulation 31(1) revokes the 1996 Regulations.
By virtue of regulation 31(2), the 1996 Regulations continue to apply
where an act or omission of a senior officer which may amount to a
disciplinary offence under the 1996 Regulations occurs before the date
on which these Regulations come into force.
Notes:
[5]
Section 30 was substituted by the Police and Magistrates' Courts Act 1994 (c.29), section 55(1).back
[6]
S.I. 1976/1073; relevant amending instruments are S.I. 1985/111, 1990/469, 1993/3081 and 1995/596.back
ISBN
0 11 059037 6
| |